1. I personally find it the most efficient to draw the reader into my paper by stating vague concepts and ideas which I use throughout my paper that will get the audience interested in reading my paper. For instance, I stated that there is propaganda in certain video games I played, that Disney movies about 13 years ago played a role in my personal development and the fact that it made me who I am today, which implies that the reader is about to hear a part of my life story. Since I made use of a rather formal and objective voice, I feel like it gives my introduction a somewhat serious touch which in my opinion does make it more interesting to read.

2. Throughout the conclusion of my paper I basically used the same strategies which I used in my introduction since that wraps up the paper in the most professional manner. Using a different tone in the intro and conclusion such as in the essay "Music Television Mike" makes the paper less convincing and less interesting. I also introduced one new thought which is supposed to get my audience thinking.

3. The answer "so what?" is answered by me stating how all of the above influenced me and shaped me who I am and introducing the idea that making use of media as an educational tool for children is a good idea.